CO129-321 - Public Offices & Others - 1903 — Page 743

Details in this case came to light and I shared them with the papers bearing upon it. I am glad if generally it was subtle with the papers.

For the case is different from those of others. Differentiation from you for Stanton, Kurt Nues, Survey, the following that one asserted that he was a witness asserting he had actually paid bribes to Qu. Suspect or Holt fee paras 20843 of Thor May's repute enclosed in the despatch referred to through a beam.

Of course, the means of judging had for this witness's value. I summed up whether you are glad of Minin substantially did in inte Vefir in your 20089 AK. I would rather be different from those of the other officers, whose services were dispensed with at the same time.

If not, I consider that he claimed to be treated in the same way as they can be. I have or or Individual word! 1903 Nov HO 736 DOMESTIC. No. 405 2 2 REC C.O. 40522 REG 6 NOV 03 (Subject.) Sale of Marine Lot No 150 Gives observations as to considers previous Paper, that award of $15000 does not meet subsequent Paper. promise made by late Gov Des Voeux.

(Minutes.) I take it that there is no prospect of the being repaired. Simply ask: Atome HBE Ra 7/1.

Page information is kept as is:

No direct page information is available in the given text, however, the original format has "Page XX" which should be kept.

The text has been proofread and formatted according to the given rules.

REG1178/1922/32(III) is not present, but `C.O.40522` and `REG 6 NOV 03` are formatted as per rule 10.

The output is in HTML format using

for paragraphs.